Regarding Trust: If you trust scientists, Government, industry, clergy, or any other human you are a naive. Even your own parents probably once assured you that Santa Claus was real (he's not). All other humans have an incentive to mislead you for their own purposes, and it only needs them justifying it to themselves (not to you). Only God can be trusted because He made you and He put a potential in you which He presumably wants to see grow to fruition. Doing anything on trust of anyone else alone is foolish. We recommend that you pursue truth based on evidence never trust.

Regarding Science: Althought science is still fine as a method you use yourself, don't expect any truth coming from scientific culture. Science culture, being based on credentials more than verifiable facts, has become so vain and politicized that it teaches that there's no God, doesn't consider a woman's pregnancy to be human, and can't even define what a man or a woman is anymore. The only thing science culture is good for now is helping us keep track of the very latest nonsense which some people are willing to believe. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools (Bible, KJV, Romans 1:22)

Regarding the War on Misinformation: Certainly an accurate understanding of truth on an issue is necessary to make a wise decision on any issue, or even to intervene on the right side: you can literally die for lack of the right information (Bible, Hosea 4:6). Truth evolves best when everyone is encouraged to put the evidence they have on the table, so that our model of understanding includes all available evidence. Misinformation can only be judged after we have a model which fits all the evidence and only judged by decision-makers as their right to do so. Restricting decision-makers from hearing some voices doesn't serve truth but only shelters false narratives from being proven false. Consequently Government initiatives to silence independent news should be strongly opposed as the direct threat to the evolution of truth which they are.

Greater Morality: Lesser morality is based on consideration of the fairness of how an action might affect other humans, but greater morality includes consideration of how the action would affect all other life, including the rest of life on this planet, and including the Creator of all life. Taking this more comprehensive perspective can help us better define correct morality on many issues our society has struggled with, including: blasphemy, animal rights, nuclear weapons, transgenderism, genetic engineering, and elective abortion.

Regarding Money: Fiat currency has no intrinsic value, being only a psychological exploitation of multi-generational trust in a money system usually originally trusted only because it was explicitly interconvertable with a commodity (beware storing your wealth in something of no intrinsic value). Beyond that, fractional reserve banking and chronic government debt only multiply the dangers of fiat money. It's a fiction-based money system, benefitting those with power to create the money, which inherent fragility has become a great threat to our society which should not have existed.

Regarding Abortion: Beware that the word 'fetus' is an animal word which when applied to human children mentally and therefore legally strips them of human rights. Another example of labelling humans with animal terms resulting in bloodshed was calling Tutsi's 'cockroaches' on which label the 1992 Rwanda genocide was based.

Regarding the Ukraine War: The People of the West seem to think that this is about opposing Russian aggression, but actually Russia only joined in 2022 a war which has been on since 2014. It started with the Ukraine Government attacking eastern regions' Peoples because they voted in referendum to separate, and then Russia backed the East and NATO backed the Ukraine government (West), the main difference being that Russia eventually decided to send in their own troops (in 2022).

Regarding Climate Change: Carbon dioxide isn't a pollutant but a basic requirement for plant photosynthesis. If you want to clean up the environment, please start with things that don't belong there at all (eg. weather weaponry, aluminum in rainwater, heavy metals in soils, mercury in lakes, trash in oceans). If you must focus on carbon dioxide, please use the Earth's natural sop-up mechanism for that (plants) before you resort to radical scientific interventions (direct air capture) and social restrictions (carbon credit spending).

Regaring Vaccines: It's tantamount to murder to mandate something which bears lethal, disability, and other serious risks. Genetic vaccines, in addition to medical problems, run the additional risk of offending God (for tampering with His code of life).

Regarding Fluoride: Fluoride is a toxin, of no requirement by the human body. Even if it's somehow wonderful for teeth, everyone should have the right to decide their own medication: it shouldn't be added to public drinking water. For those who understand what fluoride really is out of their own experience, they need look no farther than their faucet for hard evidence of Government intentions towards the Public.

Regarding Democracy: Representative democracy isn't democracy because it doesn't necessarily provide the People with any control of the policies of governance whatsoever. Yes, you are permitted to choose someone for a fixed term, but since they typically have no obligation to rule how you want during that term, and are typically free even to do the exact opposite of what they clearly promised, it is actually no rule by the People but only a dictatorship of fixed term lengths. 'Popular Limited Dictatorship' would be a far more accurate term for this system of government.

Proof of the autocratic nature of this system was experienced clearly during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, when supposedly 'democratic' governments declared a crisis of their own choosing, gave themselves 'emergency' powers, and suspended human rights for months or years without ever giving the Public a referendum on how the People wanted the situation handled.

Regarding Politics (generally): If you care about anything, even just God alone, you need to take a keen interest in politics. Otherwise the trend is for your enemies to take an interest and simply outlaw everything you do care about. You could work your whole life for something only to have it taken away at the stroke of a pen. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, places of worship were generally shut due to Government mandates. As far as personal property goes, the current World Economic Forum plan seems to be that we'll all own nothing by 2030. People have started being arrested even for silent prayer in some places of the UK. How much worse does it have to get for good people to get involved?

Regarding the Afterlife: Though it's not emphasized as important in our society, and you're entitled to your belief, you're a fool if you don't care about where you go after death. Do the math: compare how long your life expectancy is with the eternity of the Afterlife. Make preparations.

Regarding Animals: The biology of it is that, although there are differences, animals are far more like us than different, especially at the molecular and microscopic levels, and we should be thinking about that when we decide how to treat them. At least, it should be totally unacceptable that we recognize nothing as cruel or unfair in our treatment of the many other living species which are co-inhabitants of our planet.

Regarding Cruelty: There is much cruelty in our world, legal and illegal, but it's usually deliberately hidden from both physical view and narrative attention. If you want to end it, you need to open your mind to find it.

Regarding Prayer: Mocked in our society as worthless, this is the most powerful tool of good activists: always free, always available, and supremely powerful (depending on certain factors). Neglect it at your peril.

Regarding Religious Choice: Religious choice is best approached viewing choice of god, religion, and clergy as three separate choices, so that strength or weakness in one category is not interpreted as implying strength or weakness in the others. The most important measure is not charisma or community but how well that approach is connecting you with your Creator.

Regarding Luciferianism: The right to choose your own religion should not be extended to worshipping and serving clear enemies of humanity because that would represent an enemy allegiance against humanity.

Regarding Racism: This should have been a non-issue but is blown into a big problem by those who benefit from the division it creates. Race should not be an important dinstinction between humans, and we should stop dividing people on the basis of race, on either side of this issue, to end the problem. The threat against humanity is so large now that we humans need to stick together perhaps more than ever.

Regarding the Big Picture: There are many life threats at work in the world now, and they seem to converge on one goal: the gradual enslavement or extermination of humanity. The method seems to prefer using our own social systems to advance that goal, especially: the capture of our democracies (not being permitted righteous voting options in practice, such as no option to end income tax) or the outright suspensions of them (eg. COVID-19 emergency powers), the crafting of the laws which increasingly defend immorality more than morality, the mis-spending of our public resources, the mis-direction of our military, and the invisible cooperation of many humans we turn to for guidance in truth and morality. Even dictionary definitions of well-known words have quietly changed (such as how the word 'vaccine' was recently changed away from meaning something which confers immunity), so that when someone tells you something it might not mean what you think it means. The lack of our recognition and resistance to this program is heartbreaking. For example, it didn't take any coercion to convince our society that killing our own children is a practice to defend, with only a small minority refusing to vote for political parties which permit or promote it. Human spirituality, rights, gender (eg. legal experts can no longer define what a woman is), and even genetics are also under serious attack recently and all with at least implied majority public support, with fear being the primary motivator. Presumably only some kind of non-human intelligence could have an incentive to be behind such sweeping attacks on what it means to be human, and we are fools or worse if we cooperate with that agenda.